"Know to" type words still indicate medical benefit. As soon as you mention that it relieves acne and oily skin, clear blemishes and other skin irritations it is an over the counter drug or labeled as a cosmetic.
http://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/guidanceco ... 074201.htmPeople like her really chap my a$$. And just because the almighty Oprah approves, her audience will do too without doing any research. Anyone remember the Safe Cosmetics Act HR 5786 that is winding its way in congress? What this bill would do if passed:
Ingredient lists will be required to disclose each and every detectable trace chemical in a product. This does not mean that just the ingredients will be listed. It means that every single solitary molecule of anything that can be detected will be required to be put in the ingredient listing. Not only will this require those annoying “fold out” style product info lists because of the ludicrous number of trace chemicals, but it will overwhelm consumers with information they may not understand or find to be useful.
Because of the ingredient listing requirement, expensive testing will be necessary to determine each detectable trace chemical. Knowing which molecules exist in the parts-per-billion range is really not at all necessary. Many of the foods we eat, including water, contain trace amounts of ingredients that are absolutely harmless, but which could needlessly scare consumers if mentioned. For example, arsenic in water. On June 29, 2010, our family used a water fountain in the visitor center at Mt. Rushmore that was found to have higher than normal amounts of arsenic in it’s supply. The fountain was operating, but a sign was posted above it, stating the arsenic level, and that it was safe to drink. It is scary to think that a business could go under simply because a trace chemical that has always been there, now has to be reported, and will scare the consumer. Most natural ingredients contain elements which are toxic in large amounts.
http://barsoapnatural.com/blog/tag/open-congress/